How OmniRoute Quota-Share Routing Distributes Shared Account Quota Across Connections
OmniRoute distributes shared account quota through a three-phase in-process algorithm: bucket-gating checks, Deficit Round-Robin weighted ordering, and Power-of-Two-Choices load balancing—always failing open so no request is hard-blocked.
The quota-share routing strategy in OmniRoute handles combos auto-minted with the qtSd/ prefix. Unlike other routing modes, this implementation is entirely in-process: no database queries or network calls occur during target selection. This design ensures sub-millisecond overhead while distributing load fairly across multiple provider connections sharing a single quota pool.
Three-Phase Quota Distribution Algorithm
The algorithm runs on every request targeting a quota-share combo. Each phase refines the candidate list while maintaining the fail-open guarantee—a request always has at least one candidate, even when all connections are saturated.
Phase 1: Per-Model Bucket Gating
Each connection tracks usage buckets for three windows: 5-hour, 7-day, and per-model 7-day. The filterEligibleBySaturation function in [quotaShareStrategy.ts](https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute/blob/release/v3.8.50/open-sse/services/combo/quotaShareStrategy.ts) checks these buckets via isBucketSaturated from [accountBuckets.ts](https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute/blob/release/v3.8.50/src/lib/quota/accountBuckets.ts).
- Saturated connections are de-prioritized (moved to the tail of the candidate list)
- Never dropped—the combo remains viable for every request
- Evaluation happens against the requested model string (e.g.,
"anthropic/claude-opus-4")
This fail-open approach distinguishes quota-share routing from hard-rejection strategies. Even when quota windows are exhausted, traffic continues to flow through de-prioritized channels.
Phase 2: Deficit Round-Robin (DRR) Ordering
On the remaining eligible connections, applyDrr implements weighted fair queuing via per-target deficit tracking:
| DRR Component | Behavior |
|---|---|
| Quantum | Added each round, proportional to connection weight |
| Deficit accumulator | Each target maintains running deficit in _drrState |
| Selection | Highest deficit wins; winner's deficit decremented by 1 |
| Outcome | Deterministic, weight-proportional distribution over time |
The DRR state persists in-memory using the combo name as key. For combo qtSd/my-shared-combo, deficits accumulate independently of other combos sharing the same connections.
Phase 3: Power-of-Two-Choices (P2C) Load Balancing
The final selection occurs in pickByInflightP2C from [quotaShareInflight.ts](https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute/blob/release/v3.8.50/open-sse/services/combo/quotaShareInflight.ts):
- Take top two DRR candidates
- Compare their current in-flight request counts
- Select the lighter-loaded candidate
- Tie-breaker: DRR winner prevails
Chosen targets receive immediate in-flight increment; a cleanup callback decrements on completion. This prevents thundering-herd scenarios without centralized coordination.
Optional Phase: Per-Connection Concurrency Cap
Before DRR execution, partitionByConcurrencyCap evaluates provider_connections.max_concurrent:
- Connections at their cap → de-prioritized behind connections with headroom
nullor≤0values → treated as unlimited- Maintains fail-open: at-cap connections remain viable, just ordered later
Final Dispatch Priority
The complete ordering after all phases:
1. P2C winner (lightest-loaded of top-2 DRR)
2. Connections with concurrency headroom
3. Connections at concurrency cap
4. Bucket-saturated connections (de-prioritized)
This hierarchy ensures quota-respecting weighted distribution while preserving service availability under all conditions.
Code Implementation Examples
Programmatic Target Selection
import { selectQuotaShareTarget } from "@/open-sse/services/combo/quotaShareStrategy";
import type { ResolvedComboTarget } from "@/open-sse/services/combo/types";
const targets: ResolvedComboTarget[] = [
{ connectionId: "c1", executionKey: "c1-0", weight: 2, provider: "anthropic", model: "claude-opus-4" },
{ connectionId: "c2", executionKey: "c2-0", weight: 1, provider: "openai", model: "gpt-4" },
];
const caps = new Map<string, number | null>([
["c1", 5],
["c2", null],
]);
const result = selectQuotaShareTarget(
targets,
"qtSd/my-shared-combo",
"anthropic/claude-opus-4",
Date.now(),
{ maxConcurrentByConnection: caps }
);
// Execute request against result.target
try {
await executeRequest(result.target);
} finally {
result.decrementInflight();
}
Deterministic Testing
import { selectQuotaShareTarget, _clearDrrStateForTest } from "@/open-sse/services/combo/quotaShareStrategy";
_clearDrrStateForTest();
const now = 1722836400000;
const { target } = selectQuotaShareTarget(targets, "combo-test", "openai/gpt-4", now);
// DRR outcome is deterministic with fixed clock and clean state
Key Source Files
| File | Responsibility |
|---|---|
open-sse/services/combo/quotaShareStrategy.ts |
Core three-phase orchestration |
src/lib/quota/accountBuckets.ts |
Bucket saturation detection |
open-sse/services/combo/quotaShareInflight.ts |
In-flight tracking and P2C selection |
open-sse/services/combo/quotaShareConcurrency.ts |
Per-connection semaphore management |
tests/unit/quota-share-strategy.test.ts |
Algorithm verification and fail-open assertions |
Summary
- Quota-share routing operates entirely in-process with zero external dependencies
- Three ordered phases (bucket gating → DRR → P2C) progressively refine target selection
- Fail-open design guarantees at least one candidate per request regardless of quota state
- Weighted distribution via Deficit Round-Robin respects configured connection weights
- Load awareness through Power-of-Two-Choices in-flight comparison prevents hot-spotting
- Concurrency caps provide optional backpressure without hard rejection
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens when all connections in a quota-share combo are saturated?
The request still receives a candidate. Saturated connections are de-prioritized to the end of the list, but never removed. This fail-open behavior ensures service continuity even during quota exhaustion, as implemented in filterEligibleBySaturation within [quotaShareStrategy.ts](https://github.com/diegosouzapw/OmniRoute/blob/release/v3.8.50/open-sse/services/combo/quotaShareStrategy.ts).
How does DRR differ from simple round-robin in OmniRoute?
Simple round-robin gives equal turns to all connections regardless of weight. Deficit Round-Robin accumulates quantums proportional to each connection's configured weight, allowing weighted fair distribution. A connection with weight 2 receives twice the throughput opportunity of weight 1 over extended sequences, tracked via the _drrState Map in the strategy implementation.
Why use Power-of-Two-Choices instead of selecting the single DRR winner?
P2C provides load-awareness without perfect global knowledge. By comparing the top two DRR candidates by in-flight count, OmniRoute avoids directing traffic to a connection that happens to lead in deficit but is currently overloaded. This two-choice sampling mitigates tail latency without requiring centralized load state synchronization.
Can concurrency caps cause requests to fail with no available target?
No. The partitionByConcurrencyCap logic follows the same fail-open principle as bucket gating. Connections at their max_concurrent limit are ordered behind those with headroom, but remain in the candidate list. A request only fails if the combo configuration itself contains zero connections—never due to transient capacity constraints.
Have a question about this repo?
These articles cover the highlights, but your codebase questions are specific. Give your agent direct access to the source. Share this with your agent to get started:
curl -s "https://instagit.com/install.md" Maintain an open-source project? Get it listed too →