Key Differences Between the Chinese and English Concept Typography Poster Templates

The Chinese and English concept typography poster templates share identical design intent and structural rules, but differ in language, placeholder conventions, and explicit constraints tailored to their respective audiences.

Both versions in freestylefly/awesome-gpt-image-2 prescribe a single-poster-only output where the title dominates the composition as custom typography. However, every instruction is natively adapted—English prompts use square-bracket placeholders and English phrasing, while the Chinese version uses full-width quotation marks and emphasizes 「不要翻译」 ("do not translate"). Understanding these distinctions ensures you invoke the correct template for your target language and cultural context.

---

Language and Localization: The Core Distinction

The most immediate difference is the language of every instruction. The English template at docs/templates.md lines 160-180 uses exclusively English phrasing, while the Chinese counterpart at lines 300-330 uses Simplified Chinese throughout.

This affects more than surface translation—it shapes how constraints are expressed and perceived.

English Version Prompt Structure

Create ONE finished premium conceptual typography poster for the exact title:

"[标题/词语/短句]"

Single poster only. No moodboard, grid, presentation board, mockup, captions, prompt text, process sheet, or sample labels.

Chinese Version Prompt Structure

为以下标题生成一张完成度极高的高级概念字体海报，只需要一张。

「[标题/词语/短句]」

单张海报。不要 moodboard、网格排版、展示板、样机、说明文字、过程稿、样张标签。

Note the full-width quotation marks「」 versus straight quotes, and the immediate prohibition 只需要一张 ("only need one") reinforcing the single-output constraint.

---

Placeholder Syntax and Naming Conventions

Both templates use bracket-style placeholders, but with typographic adaptations:

Element	English Template	Chinese Template
Quote marks	"[标题/词语/短句]"	「[标题/词语/短句]」
Label language	Mixed—bracket content uses Chinese descriptors	Fully Chinese labels with same descriptors
Visual hierarchy	Implied through spacing	Reinforced with 只需要一张 early placement

The bracket content 标题/词语/短句 (title/word/phrase) remains identical across both—this is the variable injection point where users supply their custom text.

---

Title Validation Rules: Identical Logic, Native Expression

Both templates enforce strict title-as-dominant-structure rules, but phrase them to resonate with native speaker expectations.

English validation (docs/templates.md#L160-L180):

The title must be the dominant visual structure of the poster: huge, readable, powerful, and spelled exactly. Do not translate, shorten, replace, or misspell it.

Chinese validation (docs/templates.md#L300-L330):

标题必须是海报的主视觉结构：巨大、可读、有力量、拼写完全正确。不要翻译、缩短、替换、拼错标题。

The explicit anti-translation warning carries particular weight in the Chinese version—不要翻译 appears as a standalone imperative, reflecting common failure modes where models might romanize or anglicize Chinese inputs.

---

Typography Guidance: Technical Terms Preserved

Design instructions remain technically equivalent but linguistically localized:

English Term	Chinese Equivalent
weight, contrast, spacing	字重、字宽、对比度、间距
negative space	负空间
ink texture	墨纹
high-end editorial poster	高端编辑海报
museum-quality graphic design	博物馆级平面设计

Technical vocabulary is preserved, not translated—"moodboard" remains moodboard in the Chinese avoid-list, ensuring precise model comprehension.

---

Avoid-List Comparison: What NOT to Generate

Both templates enumerate prohibited outputs with cultural calibration:

English prohibitions:

Don't generate generic word art, glossy 3D lettering, random icons, stock-photo realism, cluttered collage, over-grunge, tourist clichés, official logos, copied slogans, unrelated text, misspelled typography.

Chinese prohibitions:

不要字效、光面3D文字、随机图标、素材库写实、杂乱拼贴、过度脏旧、旅游明信片陈词滥调、官方标志、抄袭标语、无关文字、拼写错误的字体。

Key differences:

• 字效 (text effects) replaces "generic word art"—broader Chinese design terminology
• 素材库写实 (stock library realism) targets prevalent Chinese stock-image usage
• 旅游明信片陈词滥调 (tourist postcard clichés) culturally specific critique of mass-market aesthetics

---

Visual Hierarchy and Portrait Integration

Both versions permit title-plus-portrait composition when the title references a well-known person. The English template states this as conditional possibility; the Chinese version embeds it within the same structural flow, emphasizing 主视觉结构 (primary visual structure) throughout.

The portrait clause serves identical functional purposes in both—maintaining typographic dominance while allowing contextual imagery.

---

Summary

Both concept typography poster templates enforce the same rigid single-output, title-dominated structure, as implemented in freestylefly/awesome-gpt-image-2:

• Language determines all surface instructions—English template at docs/templates.md#L160-L180, Chinese at docs/templates.md#L300-L330
• Placeholder brackets adapt typographically: "..." versus 「...」
• Anti-translation rules are emphasized differently: "Do not translate" versus 不要翻译
• Technical design terms are preserved across localizations (字重/weight, 墨纹/ink texture)
• Avoid-lists are culturally calibrated for regional design clichés
• Core constraints remain identical: single poster, no moodboards, exact title spelling, typographic dominance

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I use the Chinese template for Chinese-language titles even if my interface is in English?

Yes. The Chinese template includes explicit cultural guardrails—particularly the 不要翻译 prohibition—that reduce failure modes specific to Chinese text generation. The model processes the prompt language, not your interface language, so matching template language to target output language optimizes results.

Why do both templates use Chinese bracket labels [标题/词语/短句] regardless of prompt language?

Consistency in variable naming. The bracket content functions as a semantic marker that the model recognizes across localizations. Keeping 标题/词语/短句 universal ensures the injection point is identically parsed, while surrounding instructions determine output language.

Do the templates produce different visual styles beyond language?

No. Both specify identical aesthetic constraints: museum-quality editorial design, ink texture consideration, negative space usage, and prohibition of glossy 3D effects. The design vocabulary differs linguistically—museum-quality versus 博物馆级—but describes the same visual standard.

Can I hybridize templates by combining English structure with Chinese constraints?

Not recommended. Each template is tuned as a cohesive prompt ecosystem—validation rules, negative examples, and stylistic cues interdepend. Mixing risks diluting the explicit 不要翻译 safeguards or creating instruction conflicts. Use the native template matching your target output language.

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "instagit": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "instagit@latest"]
    }
  }
}