How AI Editors Integrate with Reverse-Skill: A Complete Technical Guide

AI editors integrate with reverse-skill by reading RULES.md to discover the behavior-chain source of truth, then invoking platform-agnostic routing scripts that dispatch security skills based on natural-language hints.

The reverse-skill repository is a skill-routing framework designed for security-oriented tasks. According to the source code, AI-based editors—including Claude Code, Kiro, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, Codex CLI, Aider, Continue, and Reasonix—must follow a strict integration contract defined in RULES.md https://github.com/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill/blob/main/RULES.md. This article explains the integration mechanism, practical code examples, and the key files that govern editor behavior.

The Core Integration Contract

The foundation of AI editor integration rests on a single principle: respect the behavior-chain source of truth. The RULES.md file explicitly mandates that regardless of which AI editor or client is used, after reading this file the editor must adhere to the routing logic rather than attempt to route skills itself.

This design deliberately decouples core routing logic from any specific AI client, enabling editors to be swapped without breaking functionality.

How AI Editor Integration Works

The integration follows a three-phase flow that maintains platform-agnostic operation.

Phase 1: Load the Behavior-Chain Source

When an AI editor opens a reverse-skill repository, it first loads RULES.md to discover the single source of truth. The editor may also reference README_AI.md for UI-specific hints and usage guidance https://github.com/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill/blob/main/README_AI.md.

Phase 2: Route Through Master Scripts

The editor does not modify routing logic or parse routing.json directly. Instead, it forwards user intent to platform-specific entry points:

• skills/scripts/master-route.sh — Unix/Linux/macOS entry point
• skills/scripts/master-route.ps1 — Windows PowerShell entry point

These scripts perform hint parsing and skill dispatch by consulting skills/config/routing.json https://github.com/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill/blob/main/skills/config/routing.json.

Phase 3: Execute and Return Results

The selected skill's procedural scripts run, generating evidence, logs, or recommendations that the editor displays. The routing framework remains unchanged for future editor sessions.

Practical Code Examples for AI Editor Integration

The following snippets demonstrate how AI-enabled editors trigger reverse-skill functionality through shell command execution—a common capability in Codex CLI, Aider, Claude Code, and similar tools.

Linux/macOS Integration

# From an AI-enabled IDE, request Windows AD enumeration

bash skills/scripts/master-route.sh --hint "enumerate Active Directory users"

Windows Integration

# From PowerShell, request Go binary reverse-engineering

powershell -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File skills/scripts/master-route.ps1 -Hint "reverse-engineer Go binary"

What Happens Internally

1. The master-route script parses the natural-language hint
2. It queries skills/config/routing.json for matching intent-to-skill mappings
3. It loads the appropriate SKILL.md (e.g., skills/windows-ad/SKILL.md)
4. It executes the skill's procedural scripts
5. It returns structured evidence to the editor's console

Key Files Governing AI Editor Integration

File	Purpose	Direct Link
RULES.md	Central behavior-chain definition; mandatory read for all AI editors	View on GitHub
AGENTS.md	Catalog of supported AI agents and integration expectations	View on GitHub
skills/config/routing.json	Intent-to-skill mapping table driving all routing decisions	View on GitHub
skills/scripts/master-route.sh	Unix shell entry point for skill dispatch	View on GitHub
skills/scripts/master-route.ps1	PowerShell entry point for Windows environments	View on GitHub
README_AI.md	Human-readable integration guide for AI-based editors	View on GitHub

Critical Constraints for AI Editor Developers

The reverse-skill framework imposes two non-negotiable constraints on AI editor integration:

• Do not bypass RULES.md — The editor must treat this file as the authoritative gate
• Do not rewrite routing JSON — The editor presents skill definitions to users but never modifies routing logic

These constraints ensure consistent, auditable security workflows across all platforms and editor implementations.

Summary

• AI editor integration requires reading RULES.md as the behavior-chain source of truth
• Master-route scripts (master-route.sh / master-route.ps1) handle all skill dispatch, not the editor itself
• Platform-agnostic design allows seamless operation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and cloud IDEs
• Strict non-modification rules preserve routing integrity and ensure reproducible security workflows
• Six core files define the complete integration surface for any AI editor

Frequently Asked Questions

Can AI editors customize the routing logic for their specific workflows?

No. The RULES.md explicitly prohibits AI editors from modifying routing logic. Editors must invoke the master-route scripts which alone may parse skills/config/routing.json. This constraint ensures that skill dispatch remains consistent and auditable across all editor implementations.

Which AI editors are officially supported by reverse-skill?

According to AGENTS.md and RULES.md, the framework recognizes Claude Code, Kiro, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, Codex CLI, Aider, Continue, and Reasonix. The architecture is designed to accommodate additional editors provided they adhere to the same integration contract.

How does reverse-skill handle cross-platform editor environments?

The framework provides dual entry points: skills/scripts/master-route.sh for Unix-like systems and skills/scripts/master-route.ps1 for Windows. Both scripts consume the same routing.json configuration, ensuring identical skill behavior regardless of the underlying platform or editor location.

What happens if an AI editor attempts to route skills directly instead of using master-route scripts?

Such behavior violates the core RULES.md contract. The framework is designed to detect or prevent this by maintaining routing logic as the single source of truth within the master scripts. Editors that bypass this mechanism risk producing inconsistent, non-auditable, or insecure workflow results.

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "instagit": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "instagit@latest"]
    }
  }
}